What's going on with number 2? Beside the fact it's a little off-center? It's, uh...ummm...It's...it's...uhhh Hell, other than atrocious I really don't know.
After browsing the site and seeing your tattoos, you're really in no position to judge anyone else's ink. Your crows are ugly, lack perspective and depth, and your zombie has jagged, horrible, unprofessionally blurred lines.
At least these tats have sharp lines, shading, and depth. Jealous, much?
the second one could also be a bad representation of a dissected eye and its extraocular muscles... except there are more than three of those. But I guess this isn't the first example of a tattoo artist cutting off vital body parts...
7 comments:
The second tat looks like it's a take off the radioactive symbol... Still not sure what it means with an eyeball in the center though
Yes its def a take on the "nuclear waste" symbol
What's going on with number 2? Beside the fact it's a little off-center? It's, uh...ummm...It's...it's...uhhh
Hell, other than atrocious I really don't know.
After browsing the site and seeing your tattoos, you're really in no position to judge anyone else's ink. Your crows are ugly, lack perspective and depth, and your zombie has jagged, horrible, unprofessionally blurred lines.
At least these tats have sharp lines, shading, and depth. Jealous, much?
what do you mean about bad tattoo?
the second one could also be a bad representation of a dissected eye and its extraocular muscles... except there are more than three of those. But I guess this isn't the first example of a tattoo artist cutting off vital body parts...
Melody, I definitely agree, they are absolutely extrinsic-ocular muscles.... aranged to look like a radioactive symbol.
Post a Comment